BENCHMARK RESULTS VISTA/XP
Here are bechmark results between Vista and XP [Thanks Thuan - Excellent information!]. As you can see benchmark results below, you will gain 5% - 25% 3dmark performance boost when downgrading from Vista to XP.
Disclaimer: Unfortunately we don't have further info about how this benchmark was performed.
| BENCHMARK | VISTA | XP | GAIN | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3dmark 2000 | 24735 | 25883 | +4,6% | |
| 3dmark 2001se | 23223 | 28038 | +20,7% | |
| 3dmark 2003 | 10835 | 13699 | +26,4% | at stock 475/700 |
| 14457 | +33,4% | at 500/750 overcloking | ||
| 3dmark 2005 | 7345 | 8574 | +16,7% | |
| 3dmark 2006 | 3770 | 4651 | +23,4% |
Here is a list of things to keep in mind when posting your benchmark result.
- Please use following "standard" programs:
- Model of your G1S, CPU model and CPU speed in GHz
- Operating system 32/64-bit XP/Vista and possible service pack
- How much RAM you have 2GB/3GB/4GB
- BIOS version 202/203/204/205/300 etc.
- What video driver you were using
- Screen resolution
- Possible overclocking, extra cooling etc. information
- Note: When running benchmarks, please make sure that the battery is fully loaded and the system is set to the highest performance level.
8600M GT 3DMark06 Benchmarks Using Different nForce/nVision Drivers
Drivers up to 181.00, Updated December 19th 2008
3D Mark 06 Scores:
SM2: Represents the ability to produce Shader Model 2.0 effects
HDR/ SM3: Represents the ability to produce High Dynamic Range lighting and Shader Model 3.0 effects
SM2 + HDR: Represents both the SM2 and HDR scores combined, this column shows the most reliable performance of the driver
Notes: 3D Mark 06 results only show how the drivers perform under 3D Mark 06, they do not necessarily represent the driver's performance in real world games.
Game Scores:
Counter-Strike: Source
Engine: Source
Notes: Contains most effects found commonplace in today's games. It doesn't majorly strain the computer and is a good indication of just how high a graphics driver can pump out extra frames per second
Half-Life 2: Lost Coast
Engine: Source
Notes: Same graphics style as Counter-Strike: Source but utilizes more effects, particularly HDR lighting and complex water reflections, though some maps in Counter-Strike: Source offer this, they aren't to be found in the CSS benchmark
Crysis
Engine: CryEngine 2
Notes: Currently the god of game graphics, on Very High settings that is, it uses a vast range of effects such as Volumetric Clouds, Water Geometry, HDR lighting, Complex Shadows and Shading, Complex Reflections, Complex lighting used by other effects, and a Particle system
No overclocking used in all benchmarks. System tested on is to the left. Benched using 1280x800 no AA in 3D Mark 06
(VISTA64) 3D Mark 06 Scores sorted by Driver Version - Lowest to Highest
(VISTA64) 3D Mark 06 Scores Sorted by SM2 + HDR Score - Lowest to Highest
Counter-Strike: Source is tested with recommended settings, no AA using proprietary benchmark (VIDEO STRESS TEST in game menu)
Half-Life 2: Lost Coast is tested with recommended settings, no AA using proprietary benchmark (VIDEO STRESS TEST in game menu)
Crysis is tested with medium settings, no AA using proprietary GPU benchmark (Benchmark_GPU.bat in Bin32 folder)
The scores represent the average number of frames per second
(VISTA64) GAME BENCHMARKS - Sorted by Driver Version:
(Credit goes to "Covert" from laptopvideo2go forum. For special requests and updates please refer to the original thread)
I just ran 3D Mark 2006 and i got a score of 4217. Anyone know why I got a low score?
Heres some info on my system:
Model: G1S-A1
Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 @ 2.20GHz
Operating System: Windows XP Pro 32bit SP3
RAM: 2GB
BIOS: 300
Video Driver: 169.28 from laptopvideo2go
Screen Resolution: 1280 x 1024
Overclocking: None
SCORE: 4401
RESULTS http://service.futuremark.com/home.action;jsessionid=53ECCB89B9B9FC5D4006CA55C35A2938
G1s t7500 2,2ghz , 8600gt 256 ddr3, Ram 2gb, 160 hd, Windows Vista Ultimate 32 bits SP1 RC, bios: 300, NO overclocking.
DRIVERS: 174.31 —>http://www.laptopvideo2go.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=17737
(with 16x drivers i have 3900 points in 3dmark06)
SCORE: 4276(3DMARK 06)
Model: G1S-002C(bought in HONG KONG)
Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 @ 2.20GHz
Operating System: Windows XP Pro 32bit SP2
RAM: 2GB
BIOS: 300
Video Driver: 174.53from laptopvideo2go
Screen Resolution: 1280 x 1024
Overclocking: None
SCORE: 29598(3DMARK01)
Model: G1S-X1
Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300
Operating System: Windows XP x64 SP2
RAM: 4GB
BIOS: 300
HDD: 200 GB 7.200 RPM
VIDEO DRIVER: from laptopvideo2go… don't know which bulid.
SCREEN RESOLUTION: 1024 x 768
OC: null
G1s t7500 2,2ghz , 8600gt 256 ddr3, Ram 3gb, 160 hd, Windows Vista Ultimate 32 bits SP1 , bios: 205, NO overclocking.
4740 3Dmark06 with 174.74 and ORIGINAL .INF (with modded inf only 4400): http://www.puchu.es/varios/3dmark06.jpg
WITH OVERCLOCK
(CORE:475@600mhz
SHADERS:950@1200mhz
MEMORY:700@896mhz)
5778 3dmark06 http://www.puchu.es/G1S/record.jpg
@lord_neno: What resolution did you run that test with? Also, in the pictures you posted - 3DMark06 is showing you have a GeForce GO 8600m GS, why is that? What .inf did you use? Was it one from the original_inf.zip file? If so, what was the exact name of that .inf file? There are a TON of other .inf's in there. Reason I'm asking is - I tried to duplicate your results, and couldn't even come close.
well i have tried the 175.70 and now 4800 3dmarks06… this restuls are WITH ORIGINAL INF… with modded infs only shows 4400points…
I donwload the drivers from laptopvideo2go.com and when exec the .exe, in the folder are a file "original_inf(s).zip"… unzip ALL the files (only wokrs 1,but i dont see the name :P) into drivers folders and run setup.exe
You can download the 174.74 and 175.70 from nvidia.com (this drivers works whit 8600gt without modds)
Well i don´t know why 3dmark06 shows 8600m gs… since I didn´t use ASUS drivers it shows 8600m gs…
3D Mark 2006
4783 3DMarks
Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 @ 2.20GHz
Operating System: Windows XP Pro 32bit SP3
RAM: 2GB
BIOS: 300
Video Driver: 177.89 from laptopvideo2go
Screen Resolution: 1280 x 854
Has anyone tested the new beta-driver from nvidia? i think its 179.28 beta.
i now use the first version from asus 101.19. every new driver, i tried reduce my results about 1000 points.
Now i want to know if the official beta-driver from nvidia is better than the drivers from Asus or laptopvideo.
the driver 179.28 sucks i use 181.20 dox from laptopvideo2go is the best driver for the asus g1s runs all games good and cpu,gpu are cooler,is very stable
runs brother in arms hell's ,race driver grid,lost planet extreme,medal of honor airborne,crysis warhead,gta4,front lines fuel of war,burn out paradise city all new games
3D MARK 2006
4227 MARKS
ASUS G1S-B2
Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 @ 2.40GHz
Operating System: Windows XP Pro 32bit SP3
RAM: 3GB
BIOS: 300
Video Driver: 181.20 dox from laptopvideo2go
Screen Resolution: 1280 x 1024
hi erverybody- I DONT KNOW why i have such a bad result… can anybody explain me why?
my results:
3D MARK 2006
2946 MARKS
ASUS G1S
Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 @ 2.00GHz
Operating System: Vista Home Premium SP1
RAM: 2GB
BIOS: 300
Video Driver: 186.81 original nvidia
Screen Resolution: 1280 x 800